The caption where the following picture came from reads: "Here's What Austin's Newest Housing For the Chronically Homeless Looks Like". Not only is housing provided, but also on-site support services -- medical and vocational. This seems like a key ingredient to the program's success, but who pays for the staffing, operational and maintenance costs? Should financial sustainability be a consideration in affordable housing developments? The site will also have a mix of other commercial mixed uses, such as a Bed & Breakfast and an outdoor movie theater.
Such
mixed uses may seem incompatible with a social assistance program, but
given the higher cost of living in Hawaii, it seems reasonable to have
an accessory or even consider a primary commercial use to help make the
social component financially sustainable. What do you think -- would
this work for Honolulu? Is there an underutilized part of town that
would be appropriate for these uses? What is stopping us from building
adequate numbers of housing?
Photo Source |
Site Plan #3